List of failed SpaceX launches

Since March 2006, SpaceX has launched 5 Falcon 1, 223 Falcon 9, 6 Falcon Heavy, and 1 Starship rockets. Of these, 3 Falcon 1, 2 Falcon 9 and 1 Starship launches were complete failures and 1 Falcon 9 launch were partial failures. [1][2] As of May 2023, SpaceX has a 97.4% launch success rate.[lower-alpha 1]

Orbital launch attempts

Falcon 1

Flight No. Date / time (UTC) Launch site Payload Payload mass Orbit Customers Launch outcome Launch video
1 24 March 2006, 22:30 Omelek Island FalconSAT-2 19.5 kg LEO (Planned) DARPA Failure[3] [video 1]
Engine failure at T+33 seconds. Loss of vehicle.[4] FalconSAT-2 landed in a storage shed near the launch site.[5][6]
2 21 March 2007, 01:10 Omelek Island DemoSat LEO (Planned) DARPA Failure[7] [video 2]
Successful first-stage burn and transition to second stage, maximal altitude 289 km.[8] Harmonic oscillation at T+5 minutes. Premature engine shutdown at T+7 min 30 s. Failed to reach orbit.[9]
3 3 August 2008, 03:34[10] Omelek Island Trailblazer
PRESat
NanoSail-D
Explorers
4 kg LEO (Planned) ORS
NASA
NASA
Celestis[11]
Failure[12] [video 3]
Residual stage-1 thrust[13] led to collision between stage 1 and stage 2.[14]

Falcon 9

Flight No. Date and

time (UTC)

Booster Version[lower-alpha 2] Launch site Payload[lower-alpha 3] Payload mass Orbit Customer Launch outcome Booster landing
4 8 October 2012,

00:35[15]

F9 v1.0[16] B0006[17] CCAFS,

SLC-40

SpaceX CRS-1[18](Dragon C103) 4,700 kg (10,400 lb) (excl. Dragon mass) LEO (ISS) NASA (CRS) Success No attempt
Orbcomm-OG2[19] 172 kg (379 lb)[20] LEO Orbcomm Partial failure[21]
CRS-1 was successful, but the secondary payload was inserted into an abnormally low orbit and subsequently lost. This was due to one of the nine Merlin engines shutting down during the launch, and NASA declining a second reignition, as per ISS visiting vehicle safety rules, the primary payload owner is contractually allowed to decline a second reignition. NASA stated that this was because SpaceX could not guarantee a high enough likelihood of the second stage completing the second burn successfully which was required to avoid any risk of secondary payload's collision with the ISS.[22][23][24]
5 28 June 2015,

14:21[15][25]

F9 v1.1B1018[17] Cape Canaveral,

LC-40

SpaceX CRS-7[26](Dragon C109) 1,952 kg (4,303 lb)[27] (excl. Dragon mass) LEO (ISS) NASA (CRS) Failure (in flight)[28][29] Precluded[30]

(drone ship)

Launch performance was nominal until an overpressure incident in the second-stage LOX tank, leading to vehicle breakup at T+150 seconds. Dragon capsule survived the explosion but was lost upon splashdown as its software did not contain provisions for parachute deployment on launch vehicle failure.[31](more details below) The drone ship Of Course I Still Love You was towed out to sea to prepare for a landing test so this mission was its first operational assignment.[32]
6 [lower-alpha 4] 3 September 2016,

07:00 (planned)[33]

F9 FT

B1028[34]

Cape Canaveral,

LC-40

AMOS-6[35] 5,500 kg (12,100 lb) GTO Spacecom Precluded
(failure pre-flight)
Precluded

(drone ship)

The rocket and the AMOS-6 payload were lost in a launch pad explosion on 1 September 2016 during propellant filling procedures prior to a static fire test.[36] The pad was clear of personnel, and there were no injuries.[37][38] SpaceX released an official statement in January 2017 indicating that the cause of the failure was a buckled liner in several of the Composite overwrapped pressure vessel (COPV) (used to store helium which pressurize the stage's propellant tanks), causing perforations that allowed liquid and/or solid oxygen to accumulate underneath the lining, which was ignited by friction.[39] Following the explosion, SpaceX has switched to performing static fire tests only without attached payloads.(more details below)

Starship

Flight

No.

Date and

time (UTC)

Booster Version Launch site Payload Payload mass Orbit Customer Launch

outcome

Booster landing
7 20 April 2023,

13:33

Prototype Starbase Texas Unknown Unknown Suborbital None Failure No attempt planned
The first integrated test flight broke up in the atmosphere after a stage separation failure.

Videos

Notes

  1. Total number of SpaceX launch as of May 2023 : 5+227+1 = 233. Out of 233 launches, 3+2+1=6 were complete failures. 227 out of 233 is a 97.4% success rate.
  2. Falcon 9 first-stage boosters are designated with a construction serial number and an optional flight number when reused, e.g. B1021.1 and B1021.2 represent the two flights of booster B1021. Launches using reused boosters are denoted with a recycled symbol ♺.
  3. Dragon 1 or 2 are designated with a construction serial number or name and an optional flight number when reused, e.g. Dragon C106.1 and Dragon C106.2 represent the two flights of Dragon C106. Dragon spacecraft that are reused are denoted with a recycled symbol ♺.
  4. Since it was a pre-flight test, SpaceX does not count this scheduled attempt in their launch totals. Some sources do consider this planned flight into the counting schemes, and as a result, some sources might list launch totals after 2016 with one additional launch.

    References

    1. "SpaceXNow - Stats". spacexnow.com. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    2. Berger, Eric (2021-05-26). "Falcon 9 completes its 100th successful flight in a row [Updated]". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    3. Brian Berger (2006-07-19). "Falcon 1 Failure Traced to a Busted Nut". Space.com. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    4. Tom Junod (14 November 2012). "Elon Musk: Triumph of His Will". Esquire. Retrieved 24 June 2017.
    5. France, Marty; Lawrence, Tim. "FalconSAT-2 Launched (and Recovered)" (PDF). United States Air Force Academy. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-09-21. Retrieved 2013-03-15.
    6. "FalconSAT Program". United States Air Force Academy. Retrieved 2022-11-14.
    7. Tariq Malik (2007-03-21). "SpaceX's Second Falcon 1 Rocket Fails to Reach Orbit". Space.com. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    8. SpaceX (2022-11-14). "Falcon 1 User Manual" (PDF). Georing. Retrieved 2022-11-14.
    9. "Demo Flight 2 Flight Review Update" (PDF). SpaceX. 15 June 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2008.
    10. Stephen Clarke (3 August 2008). "Falcon 1 suffers another setback". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 24 June 2017.
    11. "Space Exploration Technologies Corporation - Launch Manifest". 2009-04-14. Archived from the original on 2009-04-14. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    12. sscott (2008-08-04). "SpaceX's Falcon 1 Flight 3 Launch Fails - Via Satellite -". Via Satellite. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    13. "spacex - Why couldn't the Falcon 1 flight 3 launch make it to orbit?". Space Exploration Stack Exchange. Retrieved 2022-11-14.
    14. "Flight 3 mission summary". SpaceX. 6 August 2008. Archived from the original on 27 September 2018. Retrieved 24 June 2017.
    15. "Launch Log". Spaceflight Now. February 1, 2016. Archived from the original on April 22, 2016. Retrieved February 9, 2016.
    16. Clark, Stephen (May 18, 2012). "Q&A with SpaceX founder and chief designer Elon Musk". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved June 29, 2012. The next version of Falcon 9 will be used for everything. The last flight of version 1.0 will be Flight 5. All future missions after Flight 5 will be v1.1.
    17. "Space Launch Report: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.2 Data Sheet". Space Launch Report. August 14, 2017. Retrieved August 13, 2017.
    18. "SpaceX Launch Manifest". SpaceX. Archived from the original on October 4, 2012. Retrieved September 25, 2012.
    19. (secondary payload) de Selding, Peter B. (May 25, 2012). "Orbcomm Eagerly Awaits Launch of New Satellite on Next Falcon 9". SpaceNews. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
    20. Krebs, Gunter. "Orbcomm FM101, ..., FM119 (OG2)". Gunter's Space Page. Retrieved April 16, 2017.
    21. "Opinion | First Outing for SpaceX". The New York Times. 2012-10-29. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    22. Clark, Stephen (October 11, 2012). "Orbcomm craft falls to Earth, company claims total loss". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved October 11, 2012.
    23. de Selding, Peter B. (October 11, 2012). "Orbcomm Craft Launched by Falcon 9 Falls out of Orbit". SpaceNews. Retrieved October 12, 2012. Orbcomm requested that SpaceX carry one of their small satellites (weighing a few hundred pounds, versus Dragon at over 12,000 pounds)... The higher the orbit, the more test data [Orbcomm] can gather, so they requested that we attempt to restart and raise altitude. NASA agreed to allow that, but only on condition that there be substantial propellant reserves, since the orbit would be close to the space station. It is important to appreciate that Orbcomm understood from the beginning that the orbit-raising maneuver was tentative. They accepted that there was a high risk of their satellite remaining at the Dragon insertion orbit. SpaceX would not have agreed to fly their satellite otherwise, since this was not part of the core mission and there was a known, material risk of no altitude raise.
    24. Clark, Stephen (November 14, 2012). "Dragon Mission Report". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved November 10, 2017.
    25. "NASA Opens Media Accreditation for Next SpaceX Station Resupply Launch" (Press release). NASA. May 20, 2015. Retrieved May 20, 2015. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
    26. "Launch Manifest". SpaceX. Archived from the original on August 2, 2013. Retrieved July 31, 2013.
    27. "SpaceX CRS-7 Mission Overview" (PDF). NASA. June 2015. Retrieved August 17, 2017. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
    28. Chang, Kenneth (June 28, 2015). "SpaceX Rocket Explodes After Launch to Space Station". The New York Times. Retrieved June 29, 2015.
    29. Mike Wall (2015-07-20). "SpaceX Rocket Explosion Likely Caused by Faulty Strut, Elon Musk Says". Space.com. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    30. Bergin, Chris; Chris Gebhardt (June 24, 2015). "World launch markets look toward rocket reusability". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved July 13, 2016.
    31. Bergin, Chris (July 27, 2015). "Saving Spaceship Dragon – Software to provide contingency chute deploy". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved April 6, 2018.
    32. Smedley, Jesse (18 June 2015). "SpaceX Augments and Upgrades Drone Ship Armada". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 18 June 2015.
    33. Godwin, Curt (September 1, 2016). "SpaceX set to launch heaviest payload to date as Tropical Storm Hermine looms". SpaceFlight Insider. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
    34. Krebs, Gunter. "Falcon-9 v1.2 (Falcon-9FT)". space.skyrocket.de.
    35. de Selding, Peter B. [@pbdes] (January 26, 2016). "Spacecom of Israel: SpaceX confirms our AMOS-6 satellite, included our Ku- and Facebook/Eutelsat Ka-band for 4.0° west, to launch in May on Falcon 9" (Tweet) via Twitter.
    36. Malik, Tariq (September 1, 2016). "SpaceX Falcon 9 Rocket Explodes on Launch Pad in Florida". Space.com. Retrieved September 1, 2016.
    37. @SpaceX (September 1, 2016). "Update on this morning's anomaly" (Tweet) via Twitter.
    38. "After 2016 rocket explosion, Elon Musk's SpaceX looked seriously at sabotage". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2022-02-06.
    39. "January 2 Anomaly Updates". SpaceX. 2 January 2017. Archived from the original on 19 May 2020.
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.